i'm the last person in the world to want to defend him but...
..he has a point.
there are a lot of ways to categorize things. good variety means having something for everyone. sony is much better with sp experience than mp experiences. sony has fewer mp experiences and the ones they do have contain a fair few duds.
if you are only into mp then you know what,.. xbox is probably a better console for you. it is probably the only category in which ms is better but hey, a victory is a victory.
Sure, fair enough. That doesn't make the thread and especially the title he gave it any less stupid.
Reducing game variety to something as freaking general having multiplayer or not having multiplayer is absolutely ridiculous.
To infer that having PS Plus is worthless due to there not being any multiplayer games at E3 is just inflammatory.
To not only reduce the whole argument to exclusives but also to games shown at E3 is also just pure trolling. Does GT Sport not exist? Or Paragon? Tomorrow Children? etc.
Assuming that just because a freshly announced game wasn't shown with multiplayer means it won't have any is just jumping the gun. Scalebound (whose coop looked atrocious btw.) wasn't announced with multiplayer either. The last God of War had multiplayer, who's to say this won't have any? What about Spider Man or the Kojima game?
His thread was poorly thought out and created to do nothing but rile people up.
It's about as bad as kowenicki's comment in the same thread how every Sony game is now trying to copy Uncharted and TLOU.