Donald Trump is the 45th president of America

Started by Legend, Nov 09, 2016, 07:41 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Raven

Ah yes. Jill Stein. The same candidate who promised to get rid of America's nuclear weapons. Either she's full of shame and knows there is no way she could pull that off or so delusional that she honestly believes she could. I don't need to go into why that's a bad idea and would never fly with the rest of the government, nevermind the people. Safe to say that any candidate who tells you that is dangerous one way or the other.

the-pi-guy

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 04:57 PMThis recount is like having a 2.28 mile race. The winner finishing 50 feet in front and the last place guy asking for a video review
There is no evidence of a hack. That's why the recount needs to be paid by jill and they can use the machines. She tried forcing a hand count and the judge said no

Like i said she's using it for personal reasons.  Wasn't going to change anything.
The party did the exact same thing in a previous election.  It's like this:  
"See guys, we are honest people and
We are making sure it's an honest election"


DD_Bwest

i think its important to look into it, to see if its true or not.   Now this isnt because i question the results, but to make sure their isnt a breach in the system.  even if its only 50 votes that were hacked and changed, it would be important to figure out how the fudge that happened, and how to prevent it in the future.  you dont want an even bigger mishap in future years.

Max King of the Wild

Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Dec 02, 2016, 05:08 PMLike i said she's using it for personal reasons.  Wasn't going to change anything.
The party did the exact same thing in a previous election.  It's like this:  
"See guys, we are honest people and
We are making sure it's an honest election"
Right, but Clinton supporters are rallying behind the recount (not stein) because it's "so close"

Max King of the Wild

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Dec 02, 2016, 05:12 PMi think its important to look into it, to see if its true or not.   Now this isnt because i question the results, but to make sure their isnt a breach in the system.  even if its only 50 votes that were hacked and changed, it would be important to figure out how the fudge that happened, and how to prevent it in the future.  you dont want an even bigger mishap in future years.
One County in and the votes are near identical. Towns in other countries are reporting no change.

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 05:15 PMOne County in and the votes are near identical. Towns in other countries are reporting no change.
ya, i wouldnt be surprised if their is no breach,  but this kinda stuff should happen just to safe guard the democratic process.  Its important to know that it is free from corruption.

Max King of the Wild

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Dec 02, 2016, 05:19 PMya, i wouldnt be surprised if their is no breach,  but this kinda stuff should happen just to safe guard the democratic process.  Its important to know that it is free from corruption.
If that were what she was going for, she should have picked MI and an equally large blue state that was close

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 05:21 PMIf that were what she was going for, she should have picked MI and an equally large blue state that was close
Im not saying its her intention, im saying its my opinion.  I would even support a "random piss test" approach in future years to take counties across the country and random and do this.

the-pi-guy

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 05:21 PMIf that were what she was going for, she should have picked MI and an equally large blue state that was close
You mean MN.  
Those states voted the way everyone expected them to.  
A lot more reason to look into the States that didn't.  

kitler53

#145
Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 04:43 PMThis recount is stupid as shame.

The largest net difference a recount made was less than 1500 out of 6m votes. It's 2.5% of 1%. The average difference a recount makes is less than 300 votes.

Jill is obviously using the situation for personal gain.

Most common thing I see is "when it's so close... Why not verify the results."

Mother fudge maker,  it ain't close. The gap is nearly 10 times larger than a recount ever made with less votes. And they are verified. You want them reverified. Just because you don't like the results. If it were to just make sure why not recount some blue states like min and nm and NH.
trump has claimed there are millions of faudulant votes out there,... i'm looking forward to seeing trump win the popular vote after this recount exposes this wide spread voter fraud.

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 04:57 PMThis recount is like having a 2.28 mile race. The winner finishing 50 feet in front and the last place guy asking for a video review
There is no evidence of a hack. That's why the recount needs to be paid by jill and they can use the machines. She tried forcing a hand count and the judge said no

BTW - after day one, trump loses 2 votes. Clinton loses one. Stien picks up 7.
if there was clear evidence of a hack the hack wouldn't be very good.

i don't think the recount is going to expose anything but maybe it does.  honestly,.. every state should audit their counts every election if you ask me.  the entire system is built on trust and voters need to trust the process.  
         

Featured Artist: Emily Rudd

Max King of the Wild

Quote from: kitler53 on Dec 02, 2016, 05:57 PMtrump has claimed there are millions of faudulant votes out there,... i'm looking forward to seeing trump win the popular vote after this recount exposes this wide spread voter fraud.
if there was clear evidence of a hack the hack wouldn't be very good.

i don't think the recount is going to expose anything but maybe it does.  honestly,.. every state should audit their counts every election if you ask me.  the entire system is built on trust and voters need to trust the process.  
Youre not going to find the voter fraud he was talking about in Wisconsin.

DerNebel


Max King of the Wild

Quote from: DerNebel on Dec 02, 2016, 09:26 PMfixed
Illegals voting? Sure you will. When all you have to do is show an address and promise you're legally allowed to vote, people will take advantage

DerNebel

Quote from: Max King of the Wild on Dec 02, 2016, 10:05 PMIllegals voting? Sure you will. When all you have to do is show an address and promise you're legally allowed to vote, people will take advantage
You're not going to find millions of people that voted illegally which all exclusively voted for Clinton. One would have to be completely delusional to believe that.