Zelda U delayed to 2016, won't be at E3 either.

[Max King of the Wild]

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=200395

lol

even better, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7179798

I love how Nintendo fans judge quality. Watch Dogs and Destiny had problems but it was still higher quality than Nintendo's offerings. A filet mignon will always be higher quality than a skirt stake even if it's a little under cooked. I'd like to know how he judges "not many good third party games" when he's never played one. Of course,  the same exact games were on the Wii u they wouldn't be bad

[Xbro]

even better, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7179798

I love how Nintendo fans judge quality. Watch Dogs and Destiny had problems but it was still higher quality than Nintendo's offerings. A filet mignon will always be higher quality than a skirt stake even if it's a little under cooked. I'd like to know how he judges "not many good third party games" when he's never played one. Of course,  the same exact games were on the Wii u they wouldn't be bad

The same could also be turned against you. You're using a subjective argument and so are they. So let them use the argument.

[Max King of the Wild]

subjective

i don't think that word means what you think it means. Quality is by definition not subjective. Quality is a measurement. Which is why filet mignon is and always will be better than skirt steak

[Xbro]

i don't think that word means what you think it means. Quality is by definition not subjective. Quality is a measurement. Which is why filet mignon is and always will be better than skirt steak

Quality:
-How good or bad something is
-A characteristic or feature that someone or something has : something that can be noticed as a part of a person or thing
-A high level of value or excellence
-The standard of something as measured against other things of a similar kind; the degree of excellence of something.

You can't compare the quality of video games to the quality steak because the quality of video games comes from different aspects of said games. I can say Xenoblade Chronicles is higher quality than Skyrim because it has a bigger world. This is comparing one aspect of the game, and it is, of course, subjective.

[Max King of the Wild]

Quality:
-How good or bad something is
-A characteristic or feature that someone or something has : something that can be noticed as a part of a person or thing
-A high level of value or excellence
-The standard of something as measured against other things of a similar kind; the degree of excellence of something.

You can't compare the quality of video games to the quality steak because the quality of video games comes from different aspects of said games. I can say Xenoblade Chronicles is higher quality than Skyrim because it has a bigger world. This is comparing one aspect of the game, and it is, of course, subjective.

and by the definition you provided... Yup, all objective terms. Nothing subjective there.

No one in their right fudgy mind would argue a local carnival has more quality than six flags even with half the attractions closed. Even though a person can argue they have more fun at carnivals. Fun does not translate to quality.  Fun is subjective. Qualities are measurements. Nintendo lacks story, cut scenes, graphics, acting, voice acting, motion capture, and the list goes on in their games.

And please take note, I never once said nintendo games were bad unlike the iidiotic nintendo fans who never touched a third party game. it really is no mystery why the ps4 is selling like goodnight moon makes it out to be. Its where the games with most quality and quantity are thanks to third parties. It has very little to do with what Ms and Nintendo did.