Fudge Star Wars,..

Started by kitler53, Dec 14, 2015, 08:10 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Go Down Pages1 2

kitler53

Dec 14, 2015, 08:10 PM

star trek is waaaay better.
         

Featured Artist: Emily Rudd

Dr. Pezus

#1
Dec 14, 2015, 08:29 PM
What the fudge was that?

Looks like a bad Guardians of the Galaxy ripoff.
Star Trek died with JJ Abrams going to Star Wars!

Legend

#2
Dec 14, 2015, 08:54 PM
Looks better than the last two at least. New director will probably be good for the series.

DerNebel

#3
Dec 14, 2015, 09:05 PM
I went to the grocery store today and they were selling Star Wars mustard. Does Star Trek have mustard...? Didn't think so. Guess that settles that discussion. Lol

Dr. Pezus

#4
Dec 14, 2015, 09:24 PM
Quote from: Legend on Dec 14, 2015, 08:54 PMLooks better than the last two at least. New director will probably be good for the series.
wtf no!!

kitler53

#5
Dec 14, 2015, 09:57 PM
Quote from: DerNebel on Dec 14, 2015, 09:05 PMI went to the grocery store today and they were selling Star Wars mustard. Does Star Trek have mustard...? Didn't think so. Guess that settles that discussion. Lol
yeah, that star trek is waaay better because star wars is a fudgy sellout.  put mustard on that shame and eat it.
         

Featured Artist: Emily Rudd

Dr. Pezus

#6
Dec 14, 2015, 10:11 PM
Quote from: kitler53 on Dec 14, 2015, 09:57 PMyeah, that star trek is waaay better because star wars is a fudgy sellout.  put mustard on that shame and eat it.

Legend

#7
Dec 14, 2015, 10:52 PM
Quote from: Dr. Pezus on Dec 14, 2015, 09:24 PMwtf no!!
Are you saying you liked the first two and think this one looks bad, or did you dislike the first two but think this looks worse?

darkknightkryta

#8
Dec 14, 2015, 10:56 PM
The problem is that the last two Star Trek movies didn't make any money.  They more or less broke even.  So I think this is Paramount's last ditch effort to make money.  I personally think they're wrong, cause you know, space battles.  But we'll see where this goes.  

Dr. Pezus

#9
Dec 14, 2015, 10:58 PM
Quote from: Legend on Dec 14, 2015, 10:52 PMAre you saying you liked the first two and think this one looks bad, or did you dislike the first two but think this looks worse?
Liked the first two and this looks worse.

Quote from: darkknightkryta on Dec 14, 2015, 10:56 PMThe problem is that the last two Star Trek movies didn't make any money.  They more or less broke even.  So I think this is Paramount's last ditch effort to make money.  I personally think they're wrong, cause you know, space battles.  But we'll see where this goes.  
Well Star Trek is kind of niche. Maybe they should've just scaled the budget down a bit.

darkknightkryta

#10
Dec 14, 2015, 11:16 PM
Quote from: Dr. Pezus on Dec 14, 2015, 10:58 PMLiked the first two and this looks worse.
Well Star Trek is kind of niche. Maybe they should've just scaled the budget down a bit.
The budgets are comparably low.  They both cost around 150 million to make.  Pretty poultry now a days.  

Dr. Pezus

#11
Dec 14, 2015, 11:19 PM
Quote from: darkknightkryta on Dec 14, 2015, 11:16 PMThe budgets are comparably low.  They both cost around 150 million to make.  Pretty poultry now a days.  
Well then they both made quite a bit of money, unless the marketing budget is another 200m or something, then only the second one made some money

darkknightkryta

#12
Dec 15, 2015, 12:32 AM
Quote from: Dr. Pezus on Dec 14, 2015, 11:19 PMWell then they both made quite a bit of money, unless the marketing budget is another 200m or something, then only the second one made some money
"Calculating in all expenses,Deadline.com estimated that the film made a profit of $29.9 million"

That was for Into Darkness.

Dr. Pezus

#13
Dec 15, 2015, 12:45 AM
Quote from: darkknightkryta on Dec 15, 2015, 12:32 AM"Calculating in all expenses,Deadline.com estimated that the film made a profit of $29.9 million"

That was for Into Darkness.
Surely only the us?

BasilZero

#14
Dec 15, 2015, 12:55 AM
How do you "Fudge" star wars ;o!?
Go Up Pages1 2