Digital Foundry: Hands-on with Uncharted: the Nathan Drake Collection

[Mmm_fish_tacos]

3 didn't kill 2 because 3 sucked!

4 is going to be great.

3 wasn't bad, just not as good as two.

Uncharted: The Nathan Drake Collection: Some Gorgeous Photo Mode Screenshots And Textures Comparison | GearNuke

Some ps3 vs ps4 screens in the link.

[the-pi-guy]

Well it seems 3 didn't kill 2 so I don't know why 4 would kill the collection. And nobody cares about ps3 anymore. Moving them to ps4 would be best.

3 had a very different multiplayer set up than 2.  It's more diverse in setting up, but at some extent this is a fault of the game.  
With 2 everyone starts with 1 of 3 weapons if I remember right and the power weapons are found on the map where every player has a chance to get them.
If 4 was just like 3 but much much better, then it'd kill your idea for multiplayer.  

[BananaKing]

Yeah seems like loads of BS. I don't really get why they would do it, seems to me like adding MP would only be a good thing.

probably to avoid a MCC type of mess. they had limited time and porting over multiplayer would be SO much effort because of all the maps and they would probably need to write new code for the servers. doubt it would have been finished in time. or they just said fudge it, no need to do it and end up with an MCC type of situation. 3 single player games that are around 24-25 hours long is enough value.

3 didn't kill 2 because 3 sucked!

4 is going to be great.

UC3's multiplayer was leagues ahead of UC2's.

[Xevross]

probably to avoid a MCC type of mess. they had limited time and porting over multiplayer would be SO much effort because of all the maps and they would probably need to write new code for the servers. doubt it would have been finished in time. or they just said fudge it, no need to do it and end up with an MCC type of situation. 3 single player games that are around 24-25 hours long is enough value.

UC3's multiplayer was leagues ahead of UC2's.

Yeah true, time is the most likely cause. I'm not complaining at all, I never like playing multiplayer in third person shooters so I wouldn't play it anyway. I'd rather they spent more time perfecting the single player parts than trying to get the multiplayer done in time

[the-pi-guy]

probably to avoid a MCC type of mess. they had limited time and porting over multiplayer would be SO much effort because of all the maps and they would probably need to write new code for the servers. doubt it would have been finished in time. or they just said fudge it, no need to do it and end up with an MCC type of situation. 3 single player games that are around 24-25 hours long is enough value.
UC3's multiplayer was leagues ahead of UC2's.

2 and 3, were very different.  Wouldn't say one was better than the other.  Just depends what you like.