Detroit: bet on the metacritic

[Legend]

Same rules as the GOW thread. Give a high, medium, and low prediction.

IE you expect it to get a 95 so you set that as your middle. Then you set 97 as your high because you don't think the game has a good chance of scoring above that. Then you set 88 as your low because you don't expect the game to score lower than that.

Review embargo ends the day before release. Feel free to post predictions and edit them up till that time.

100:
99:
98:
97:
96:
95:
94:
93:
92:
91: nnodley
90: Kerotan
89: the-Pi-guy, Legend
88: Pezus, nnodley
87: Legend, Kerotan
86: Xevross, nnodley
85: the-Pi-guy
84: Swordfish
83: Swordfish
82: Pezus, Swordfish
81: Xevross, Kerotan
80:
79:
78: the-Pi-guy
77:
76:
75: Pezus
74: Xevross, Legend
73:
72:
71:
70:
69:
68:
67:
66:
65:

[SWORDF1SH]

83

[Xevross]

High: 86
Middle: 81
Low: 74

I'm giving this quite a wide range because I really don't know where it's gonna land. It seems good but it could really slip like Beyond.

[the-pi-guy]

Xev took the good range.  I'm gonna be really optimistic here and hope it'll be like Heavy Rain.  

High: 89
Middle: 85
Low: 78

[BananaKing]

84

[SWORDF1SH]

84

At least you're man enough to not give a range  

[BananaKing]

At least you're man enough to not give a range  

Ranges are for bedsprings.

[Legend]

83

84

Y'all need a high and low prediction too, to make this more interesting. Keep the range as small as possible but if the real score is outside your range, then you're really really bad at this.


89 high
87 mid
74 low

[Xevross]

Ranges are for bedsprings.

And for people who read OPs

[BananaKing]

And for people who read OPs

OPs are for bedsprings.

[SWORDF1SH]

Hi 84
Mid 83
Low 82

[Dr. Pezus]

High: 88
Middle: 82
Low: 75

[Legend]

This is like the complete opposite of GOW predictions. With that game we all fit nicely within the same range, while this one is all over the place.

[Xevross]

This is like the complete opposite of GOW predictions. With that game we all fit nicely within the same range, while this one is all over the place.

At least no one's low is higher than someone's high or vice-versa

[the-pi-guy]

At least no one's low is higher than someone's high or vice-versa

Maybe I'm not interpreting your vice versa correctly, but I feel like the vice versa is unnecessary because it has the same effect as the other part.  
low higher than someone's high
low
high

Vice versa: a high lower than someone's low:
low
high