WarpDrive built. NASA mystified by device.

Started by Legend, Apr 21, 2015, 07:54 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Legend

The 'impossible' EmDrive could reach Pluto in 18 months (Wired UK)
QuoteTajmar will be presenting his results at the American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics' Propulsion and Energy Forum and Exposition in Orlando on 27 July, in a paper called "Direct Thrust Measurements of an EmDrive and Evaluation of Possible Side-Effects". By side-effects, he is referring to the electric and magnetic fields that may cause false readings.
Tajmar prefers his results not to be shared in advance, but told WIRED that his paper will not close the EmDrive story and that it merits further research.

Legend

It looks like big companies have also started testing the device. If it ends up being a real reactionless drive, there's trillions of dollars to be made. Would revolutionize almost everything.

Going to deep space would become cheap and easy.

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Legend on Jul 25, 2015, 11:16 PMIt looks like big companies have also started testing the device. If it ends up being a real reactionless drive, there's trillions of dollars to be made. Would revolutionize almost everything.

Going to deep space would become cheap and easy.
some thoughts that i had been thinking, but dont have enough knowledge to figure out.  would these require alot more electrical power than current propulsion?  New horizon uses that plutonium reactor, that we are already running out of plutonium to make more of,  and i thought that thing had less then 100watts?

Legend

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Jul 26, 2015, 12:26 AMsome thoughts that i had been thinking, but dont have enough knowledge to figure out.  would these require alot more electrical power than current propulsion?  New horizon uses that plutonium reactor, that we are already running out of plutonium to make more of,  and i thought that thing had less then 100watts?
It's too soon to say. Right now the experimental data is all over the place.

What makes it so revolutionary is that it's reactionless, meaning electricity is the only fuel. New Horizons only has its engine on for short periods of time. Once it runs out of fuel, it's toast. If the engine was swapped out with an EmDrive, it could stay on for the entire duration of the flight. Even if it still took 9 years to get to Pluto, we'd have the ability to turn the probe back and send it towards another target.

In theory we could make one super probe and keep reusing it, instead of spending a few billion dollars for every launch.

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Legend on Jul 26, 2015, 01:08 AMIt's too soon to say. Right now the experimental data is all over the place.

What makes it so revolutionary is that it's reactionless, meaning electricity is the only fuel. New Horizons only has its engine on for short periods of time. Once it runs out of fuel, it's toast. If the engine was swapped out with an EmDrive, it could stay on for the entire duration of the flight. Even if it still took 9 years to get to Pluto, we'd have the ability to turn the probe back and send it towards another target.

In theory we could make one super probe and keep reusing it, instead of spending a few billion dollars for every launch.
assuming we can get a new source of plutonium 238 lol  im just wondering how we keep it powered for 9 years, if we have any other options

Raven

I'm so sad that I have not kept up with such incredibly interesting news. Here's a question. Could the answer to many of our energy concerns be less about what we're using to create that power and more about how efficient the devices using it are?

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Raven on Jul 26, 2015, 02:10 AMI'm so sad that I have not kept up with such incredibly interesting news. Here's a question. Could the answer to many of our energy concerns be less about what we're using to create that power and more about how efficient the devices using it are?
in every day life possibly, and especially in industry, but of course it comes down to the cost factor. we really need to figure out a more efficient energy source, thorium has potential if it ends up to be what some are saying, but since they obviously have a vested interest in it you cant always be sure.

Legend

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Jul 26, 2015, 02:02 AMassuming we can get a new source of plutonium 238 lol  im just wondering how we keep it powered for 9 years, if we have any other options
We have enough plutonium to get us through the next 5 years.

Plus if the warp drive works out, it'd undoubtedly be big enough news to increase NASA's budget and kickstart 238 production.

Quote from: Raven on Jul 26, 2015, 02:10 AMI'm so sad that I have not kept up with such incredibly interesting news. Here's a question. Could the answer to many of our energy concerns be less about what we're using to create that power and more about how efficient the devices using it are?
In the case of New Horizons and other deep space probes, the 238 reactor is used to keep the craft alive and operating. Rocket fuel was/is used for propellant.




the-pi-guy

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Jul 26, 2015, 02:02 AMassuming we can get a new source of plutonium 238 lol  im just wondering how we keep it powered for 9 years, if we have any other options
All space probes will come installed with gigantic solar panels that easily give enough power to them.  


(Maybe not...)

Legend

Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Jul 26, 2015, 04:32 AMAll space probes will come installed with gigantic solar panels that easily give enough power to them.  


(Maybe not...)
Well we do that for probes staying closer to Earth. Dawn, the probe orbiting Ceres, has huge panels that generate over 1 kw of power.


65 feet wide!

the-pi-guy

Quote from: Legend on Jul 26, 2015, 04:41 AMWell we do that for probes staying closer to Earth. Dawn, the probe orbiting Ceres, has huge panels that generate over 1 kw of power.


65 feet wide!
Yeah I know.  :P

DD_Bwest

Quote from: Legend on Jul 26, 2015, 04:41 AMWell we do that for probes staying closer to Earth. Dawn, the probe orbiting Ceres, has huge panels that generate over 1 kw of power.


65 feet wide!
but ofcourse as you move away you get drastically less power,  lessons i learned in kerbals :D

5 years doesnt get us very far,  and wouldnt we need to build new facilities for the plutonium?  i dont think theirs been any active production in decades.   and with pl238 being a product of the thorium process, do you think that could be a faster, better way to get it?   its one of the things thorium advocates have mentioned, and just wondering how credible that is

the-pi-guy

Quote from: DD_Bwest on Jul 26, 2015, 04:56 AMbut ofcourse as you move away you get drastically less power,  lessons i learned in kerbals :D

5 years doesnt get us very far,  and wouldnt we need to build new facilities for the plutonium?  i dont think theirs been any active production in decades.   and with pl238 being a product of the thorium process, do you think that could be a faster, better way to get it?   its one of the things thorium advocates have mentioned, and just wondering how credible that is

All dat solar power.  

Legend

#28
Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Jul 26, 2015, 04:52 AMYeah I know.  :P
I assumed, but I'm too tired and too in love with science to not post this stuff  ;)

Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Jul 26, 2015, 05:01 AM
All dat solar power.  
That's misleading! It makes it look like Pluto is only 1/40 of us.

#s for not pie  ;)


PlanetDistance (x 10^9 m)Mean Solar Irradiance (W/m2)
Mercury579116.4
Venus1082611.0
Earth1501366.1
Mars227588.6
Jupiter77850.5
Saturn142615.04
Uranus28683.72
Neptune44971.51
Pluto58060.878

Legend