LittleBigPlanet 3 reviews and stuff----Meta: 80

[Dr. Pezus]

Well the day 1 patch fixed them, no? Joystiq review sold me on it!

[ethomaz]

Well the day 1 patch fixed them, no? Joystiq review sold me on it!

That is why I suport post release reviews.

[Rorono]

IGN is pathetic

[Dr. Pezus]

I have a feeling the score will go up a bit with the later reviews

[Mmm_fish_tacos]

I have a feeling the score will go up a bit with the later reviews

I hope so, but it seems a high 70 to mid 80 os a good game these days. We might have to adjust our interpretation of review scores this gen. They were highly inflated last gen. Still I expected at least an 85...

[Dr. Pezus]

I hope so, but it seems a high 70 to mid 80 os a good game these days. We might have to adjust our interpretation of review scores this gen. They were highly inflated last gen. Still I expected at least an 85...

That has always been a good game but now it seems like great games get these scores and almost no games get anywhere close to 95 (except remasters)

[Rorono]

I hope so, but it seems a high 70 to mid 80 os a good game these days. We might have to adjust our interpretation of review scores this gen. They were highly inflated last gen. Still I expected at least an 85...

Only for Sony games, apparently.
I just see difference in treatment. TF not put down by lack of content, FH2's game breaking bugs at launch not mentioned at all, MCC with broken online only affected a handful of scores and even those reviewers waited days to see if it would be fixed whereas with LBP3 they just put the review up when the embargo lifted without caring (gamespot)

[Dr. Pezus]

Only for Sony games, apparently.
I just see difference in treatment. TF not put down by lack of content, FH2's game breaking bugs at launch not mentioned at all, MCC with broken online only affected a handful of scores and even those reviewers waited days to see if it would be fixed whereas with LBP3 they just put the review up when the embargo lifted without caring (gamespot)

(and IGN)

[Rorono]

(and IGN)

Didn't IGN just ignore MCC problems? I singled out Gamespot because with MCC they did dock points from MCC but only after waiting days, while LBP3 did not get that "benefit" (and in truth, didn't even need days as from what i understand it's already fixed in 1.02?)

[Dr. Pezus]

Didn't IGN just ignore MCC problems? I singled out Gamespot because with MCC they did dock points from MCC but only after waiting days, while LBP3 did not get that "benefit" (and in truth, didn't even need days as from what i understand it's already fixed in 1.02?)

IGN mentioned some MCC problems but still gave it 9.0...

[Mmm_fish_tacos]

I was ready to rage about gaming age review. While I think they are griping about nothing their review didn't read as harsh as I epexected consider the score posted to meta. They actually gave it a c+, where I come from that's a high 70. So how the fudge did meta get a 58 for their review? Anyway the review shouldn't be counted because they don't use a number system.

[Dr. Pezus]

@Above: Meta has always done that. Yeah I agree that C+ = 58 is not ideal.

OT: http://www.metacritic.com/user/Faqqot1994

10
Latest High Score:
Halo: The Master Chief Collection
0
Latest Low Score:
LittleBigPlanet 3

[kitler53]

i just can't take reviewers seriously anymore.   soo full of shame these days.

[Dr. Pezus]

Only 17 ratings on US PS Store?? Compared to ~500 for DA and 3500 for GTA?? Something must be wrong? Or maybe the retailer exclusive things were too good so digital sales will be low?

[kitler53]

Only 17 ratings on US PS Store?? Compared to ~500 for DA and 3500 for GTA?? Something must be wrong? Or maybe the retailer exclusive things were too good so digital sales will be low?

it had like 1.7k like prior to release so it can't be too terrible.