Started by the-pi-guy, Sep 12, 2022, 07:54 PM
previous topic - next topic0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NEWS: Ubisoft is leaving $60 behind for its big releases. Skull & Bones new-gen is $70 (that was known). Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot told me: "Some of the games will come at the same price as the competition. The big AAA games will come at $70"https://t.co/jylN7mzk2K
— Stephen Totilo (@stephentotilo) September 12, 2022
but i was told this was only Sony!!! Why is sony so baaaaadIt has been 2 years lol. Pretty obvious that the rest of the industry would eventually follow unless Sony backtracked.
literally every big game will be $70 within a couple years.
| VizionEck Cube Royale is releasing this year "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |  |  |
It has been 2 years lol. Pretty obvious that the rest of the industry would eventually follow unless Sony backtracked.I know. Lol. It's just funny all the Xbox fanboys are saying it's only Sony. But they just aren't paying attention to the industry as a whole
I know. Lol. It's just funny all the Xbox fanboys are saying it's only Sony. But they just aren't paying attention to the industry as a wholeIt will become "okay" once Nintendo does it next with their new console.
Yeah buying day one isn't just interesting anymore for me. If I wait I'll get a better experience because most bugs would be patched, sometimes more content, and a cheaper price.There is a balance point between getting a better game at a better price and getting a game that's soo old it feels dated at the time you play it. i feel like 1 year old is my target for finding that balance although tbh,.. most of the games i play are much older than that. i'm currently playing rise of tomb raider (2015) and my next game with be from this list:
By raising the price they are getting more revenue true, but they are alienating some people from buying at launch or close to launch.
It will become "okay" once Nintendo does it next with their new console.
Not sure why people complain about price, feels like game prices are in line with inflation or slightly behind.For most games it seems like inflation is offset by monetizing other elements of the game. Assassin's Creed for example has a lot of microtransactions.
| VizionEck Cube Royale is releasing this year "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me | | |
There is a balance point between getting a better game at a better price and getting a game that's soo old it feels dated at the time you play it. i feel like 1 year old is my target for finding that balance although tbh,.. most of the games i play are much older than that. i'm currently playing rise of tomb raider (2015) and my next game with be from this list:To me 1 year isn't that long. As long as its the same gen it generally wouldn't feel outdated for me. Unless its something that was released early in the gen.
- ghost of tsushima (2020)
- the last of us II (2020)
- spider man (2018)
- valkyria chronicles 4 (2018)
- outer wilds (2019)
- control (2019)
- detroit (2018)
lol, too true. too true. at the same time sony will somehow get trashed for copying nintendo...
Not sure why people complain about price, feels like game prices are in line with inflation or slightly behind.i agree. i think i played $70 for a few of my NES games...
