of course era loves gamepass. they have threads like: 52 games in 52 weeks. they are the "whales" of the industry and they gain the most by the all you can eat gaming buffet that gamepass is.
...but gamepass is not so economically great for those 10's of millions that are content with 1 game a year or just free-to-play games especially when the 1 game a year they want to play isn't coming to the service.
era acts as a "hype man" for gamepass. they are literally desperate to have causuals buy into gamepass so it can be economically viable because they don't want to go back to the days where they were play $70+ dollars a month to feed their gaming habit. ...which is exactly why gamepass is not economically viable for the industry.
MS specifically want CoD because for like 1/3 of gamers CoD is that one game a year 10's of millions of gamers buy. if they have CoD (which requires gold) it may not be soo much of an upsale to get them into gamepass.
...but gamepass is not so economically great for those 10's of millions that are content with 1 game a year or just free-to-play games especially when the 1 game a year they want to play isn't coming to the service.
era acts as a "hype man" for gamepass. they are literally desperate to have causuals buy into gamepass so it can be economically viable because they don't want to go back to the days where they were play $70+ dollars a month to feed their gaming habit. ...which is exactly why gamepass is not economically viable for the industry.
MS specifically want CoD because for like 1/3 of gamers CoD is that one game a year 10's of millions of gamers buy. if they have CoD (which requires gold) it may not be soo much of an upsale to get them into gamepass.
