They compare them because they don't understand what makes share play innovative.
It's not that you can play your friend's games, but how you play your friend's games.
Yuppers
Started by Legend, Aug 18, 2014, 07:57 AM
previous topic - next topic0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
They compare them because they don't understand what makes share play innovative.
It's not that you can play your friend's games, but how you play your friend's games.
I don't think people understand just how "innovative" that Share Play feature truly is. Though I have no idea why people are comparing game sharing (Which the PS3 had way before Microsoft announced their family plan) with it.
As far as gameplay innovations go, Share Play is definitely cool. VR isn't even available yet, so I wouldn't count it.
But yeah, I agree. Microsoft dropped the ball with One's Kinect integration, and Nintendo has hardly used the GamePad's touted innovations and superfluous features.
Or maybe I don't agree, because my definition of console extends to handhelds, and the 3DS is super nifty.
People always say Nintendo dropped the ball with Wii U but is it the same case of 3DS?
It have sales and games but it cools features are not being used.
StreetPass gets used.
VizionEck Cube Royale is releasing this year "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |
StreetPass is cool, but the Wii U can easily one up it with Miiverse.
Wii U > 3DS as far as innovation?
StreetPass is cool, but the Wii U can easily one up it with Miiverse.
Wii U > 3DS as far as innovation?
Page created in 0.240 seconds with 22 queries.