Quote from: BananaKing on Aug 11, 2026, 05:51 AMHuh?One of the most significant unsolved math problems. Anthropic's ai made real progress on solving it.
Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Aug 11, 2026, 12:19 AMNever heard of it.It speeds up, or maybe I just got used to it.
Just tried it, and I found it kind of irritating. Takes too long to get from 1 question to the next.

| 1974 | Norman Levinson | > 34.25% (\approx 1/3) | Introduced the "mollifier method" to bound zero density. |
| 1989 | J. Brian Conrey | > 40.77% (\approx 2/5) | Refined mollifiers using higher-degree polynomial choices. |
| 2011–2020 | Bui, Conrey, Young / Feng / Pratt et al. | > 41.6% | Extended bounds past 41.28\% - 41.6\% using multi-piece mollifiers. |
| 2026 | Anthropic Research | 67.2% |
We asked an unreleased research version of Claude to take a stab at the Riemann hypothesis.
— Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) August 10, 2026
It didn’t solve it, but it did make strides on a related problem: it increased the lower bound for the fraction of zeros of the Riemann zeta function that satisfy the hypothesis from…
Quote from: the-Pi-guy on Aug 10, 2026, 03:34 PMIt's not so much that it bothers me that it's set at a specific point. I'm more bothered when it feels like the characters are talking to the audience instead of each other.Oh that sucks and it's so freaking common nowadays.
Page created in 0.014 seconds with 9 queries.