??A.) The article accuses WB of taking advantage of profiting off a character that they made for someone. They based it off that 70% goes to the family, some states don't allow donations to families like that.
B.) Riders points out that 30% goes to the platform holder, so WB ends up with nothing. Nobody cares.
The part about some states not allowing it, seems like a bit of an assumption. It says "it stands to reason that WB is keeping it."
The article is at least a little wrong.
It's also possible that WB (I think) could be donating to the family regardless, or donating somewhere else.