its because his movies are usually mediocre...Well not according to my taste. It's weird because I don't like some of the highly rated comic book movies nearly as much as reviewers either
Started by Dr. Pezus, May 25, 2014, 04:14 PM
previous topic - next topic0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
its because his movies are usually mediocre...Well not according to my taste. It's weird because I don't like some of the highly rated comic book movies nearly as much as reviewers either
Well not according to my taste. It's weird because I don't like some of the highly rated comic book movies nearly as much as reviewers eitherthats because they arent as good either
Well not according to my taste. It's weird because I don't like some of the highly rated comic book movies nearly as much as reviewers eitherI'm actually starting to think Marvel movies are getting the Nintendo pass. They get high ratings because they're Marvel. There was so much wrong with Avengers 2 for instance, yet I don't see anyone talking about them in reviews.
Eh it's Snyder and his movies usually get mediocre reviews for some reason. Really liked both Watchmen and man of Steel so I'm going to see it soon!Because they are mediocre
Saw Batman/Superman yesterday. Great movie. Really don't know what the reviewers were watching.Finally. Gives me some hope!
Finally. Gives me some hope!Like there's a few things here and there, but it's that, things here and there and in every movie. Nothing mind blowingly stupid.
Saw Batman/Superman yesterday. Great movie. Really don't know what the reviewers were watching.They were watching a sequel to a crud movie with a more crud storyline
They were watching a sequel to a crud movie with a more crud storylineMan of Steel was a great movie, best Superman movie made that isn't animated. Batman/Superman has a great storyline. For comparison I found more wrong (and the plot worse) with Avengers 2 and more execution problems (And general lack of direction) with Force Unleashed. Those movies got ridiculously high ratings. The funniest thing I found about reviewers complaining about, was the thing that they spent the most time with. World building and characters. They complained about a lack of it, when they spent hours on it. There was some fallacy, but I can understand why Superman and Batman had to fight, and it made more sense than when Miller did it in the 80s. That graphic novel is considered, by these same critics, as the greatest Batman graphic novel ever. They complain about Superman, yet he puts people in danger as his utmost priority in this film. Superman was no sociopathic killer as reviewers claimed him to be. Batman wasn't some sociopathic killer as reviewers made him out to be. Where the reviewers got both those ideas is beyond me and I'd like to watch what they were watching. Hell, I was expecting a lot of brooding from Batman. Yet there wasn't any. I remember reading a reviewer about how Snyder did Watchman better in Batman/Superman than in Watchman, yet the theme of should there be Superman, is such a small part of the film.
I found Man of Steel ridiculously boring. I didn't care for any of the characters, not much really happened in it. The only reason I'd watch BvS is because of the Batman side. I loved the Dark Knight trilogy.My sister works in a theater. I go see most movies just because it's free. Very few movies aren't worth even seeing for free.
A few of my friends went to see BvS and they said its not that great and not really worth it. I trust them, so I'm not watching it in cinema.
VizionEck Cube Royale is releasing this year "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |
Man of Steel, explained superman's powers retardedly. What the fudge was the codex besides retarded? Butchered lois lanes existence. Didn't understand that gravity doesn't negate black holes pull. Killed Jonathan off in the most stupid way. Jonathan straight up tells a young Clark to let a school bus full of kids die next time. Clark just spills his guts to the first reporter to show... Should I go on?By explaining his powers retardedly, do you mean 100% comic based? Superman gets all his powers from the sun. It's been this way for maybe 50 years now. It's been this way in every medium. You'd have to know nothing about Superman (Which I suspect is the case for the majority of people complaining about these two films) to complain about that.
My sister works in a theater. I go see most movies just because it's free. Very few movies aren't worth even seeing for free.
Add me to the hate train for Man of steel. Everything in it was just so average, and they made superman feel underpowered.Superman under powered? You crazy? He caused trillions of dollars in damages. On top of that he managed to take Zod up into Space in minutes and they both came back down in reminiscence of gods. My dad actually said, when we were watching that part "What if people like that exist in the universe and came here to take over. What would we do?". Plus they're portraying Superman on the high end of his portrayals. Like, how absurd he is in comics currently is how he is in this movie. Still the most physically strongest being shown in movies.
I think bvs looks much better, but I'm worried it ends with a huge cliffhanger.
Page created in 0.210 seconds with 22 queries.