Do you know the plots or are you going in blind?I don't know the plots, but I also don't know when I'll be getting the game...

I think I will get the previous games first. But we'll see.

Started by Xevross, Apr 11, 2018, 05:21 PM

previous topic - next topic0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Do you know the plots or are you going in blind?I don't know the plots, but I also don't know when I'll be getting the game...

I think I will get the previous games first. But we'll see.

Holy balls! Its gone up 3 places on the all time list. Only one place below The Last of Us now! Its as close to 96 as it is 94. Insane.It's as close to 93 as it is to 97. Believe!

- 2 people like this.

I love Raven. Raven is the love of my life. "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |

Assuming I counted accurately, 11 games to pass to get to 96. It's just below The Last of Us

Assuming I counted accurately, 11 games to pass to get to 96. It's just below The Last of UsYeah. Games will be more closely distributed the lower the score though. So if its 10 below and 11 above, its probably more like only 1/3 of the way through rather than half.

- 1 person likes this.

From a purely mathematical point of view, how much more prestigious is a 95 vs a 94? 10/10 is the max score so it's a lot harder to get higher averages.

GOW:A servers still up? You should play that!!!

I don't know the plots, but I also don't know when I'll be getting the game...I bought the game but I'm not sure when I'll play it either

I think I will get the previous games first. But we'll see.

GOW:A servers still up? You should play that!!!

- 1 person likes this.

I love Raven. Raven is the love of my life. "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |

From a purely mathematical point of view, how much more prestigious is a 95 vs a 94? 10/10 is the max score so it's a lot harder to get higher averages.Opencritic's chart is a good way to look at this. 94-96 is in the top 0.1% of games while 91-93 is top 0.4% of games. This means there's 3x more games in the 91-93 range than 94-96.

If you want to compare closer though, metacritic's all time chart has 55 games at 94, while only 20 at 95. So almost 3x more rare there too. That's actually the biggest jump as well.

92: 80 games

93: 57 games

94: 55 games

95: 21 games

96: 21 games

97: 15 games

98: 4 games

99: 1 game

94 --> 95 is quite a big difference it seems, using actual data.

Opencritic's chart is a good way to look at this. 94-96 is in the top 0.1% of games while 91-93 is top 0.4% of games. This means there's 3x more games in the 91-93 range than 94-96.That's mostly a measure of how common good games are. You'd instead probably need to do it with a probability curve assuming fully random reviews.

If you want to compare closer though, metacritic's all time chart has 55 games at 94, while only 20 at 95. So almost 3x more rare there too. That's actually the biggest jump as well.

92: 80 games

93: 57 games

94: 55 games

95: 21 games

96: 21 games

97: 15 games

98: 4 games

99: 1 game

94 --> 95 is quite a big difference it seems, using actual data.

Basically a measure of how many possible review configurations could land on the final score.

IE roll two 5 sided dice. What's the probability they add up to 10? It's lower than the probability they add up to 9.

I love Raven. Raven is the love of my life. "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |

That's mostly a measure of how common good games are. You'd instead probably need to do it with a probability curve assuming fully random reviews.Yeah but you'd have to model the curves off something. Well, of course it would be a gaussian but what exact shape, who knows.

Basically a measure of how many possible review configurations could land on the final score.

IE roll two 5 sided dice. What's the probability they add up to 10? It's lower than the probability they add up to 9.

Okay fine. So looking at publications on meta, 74 seems to be the average. Now the majority of games are less than 98, so I set standard deviation to 8.

P(x>93)=0.00877 or 0.877% are higher than 93. P(x>94)=0.00621, or 0.621%. P(x>95)=0.00433, or 0.433%.

s.d. is probably different but eh that's good enough. There you go.

0.256% of games at 94, and 0.621% of games are above them. 0.188% of games at 95 meta, and 0.433% above them.

Edit: Set s.d. to 7 and you get 0.118% at 94, 0.214% above them. 0.079% at 95 and 0.135% above them.

- 2 people like this.

Yeah but you'd have to model the curves off something. Well, of course it would be a gaussian but what exact shape, who knows.#EverydayMath

Okay fine. So looking at publications on meta, 74 seems to be the average. Now the majority of games are less than 98, so I set standard deviation to 8.

P(x>93)=0.00877 or 0.877% are higher than 93. P(x>94)=0.00621, or 0.621%. P(x>95)=0.00433, or 0.433%.

s.d. is probably different but eh that's good enough. There you go.

0.256% of games at 94, and 0.621% of games are above them. 0.188% of games at 95 meta, and 0.433% above them.

- 1 person likes this.

#EverydayMathI added an edit. standard dev. of 7 seems more likely.

Basically top 0.332% of games vs. top 0.214%. About 1/3 of the data in 94-100 range is in 94 itself, so 95 is quite a lot better,

Yeah but you'd have to model the curves off something. Well, of course it would be a gaussian but what exact shape, who knows.That's not what I was meaning, but it's probably way more useful so I'll take it!

Okay fine. So looking at publications on meta, 74 seems to be the average. Now the majority of games are less than 98, so I set standard deviation to 8.

P(x>93)=0.00877 or 0.877% are higher than 93. P(x>94)=0.00621, or 0.621%. P(x>95)=0.00433, or 0.433%.

s.d. is probably different but eh that's good enough. There you go.

0.256% of games at 94, and 0.621% of games are above them. 0.188% of games at 95 meta, and 0.433% above them.

Edit: Set s.d. to 7 and you get 0.118% at 94, 0.214% above them. 0.079% at 95 and 0.135% above them.

I love Raven. Raven is the love of my life. "I'm Mike Armbrust" -Me |

That's not what I was meaning, but it's probably way more useful so I'll take it!Gaussians are always the answer.

l--------------------94----------------------l-------------95-------------l--------96--------l-----97-----l--98--l-99-l100

Well here's my (stupidly accurate for what this is) visual representation. You're welcome.

Man I have no life.

Well here's my (stupidly accurate for what this is) visual representation. You're welcome.

Man I have no life.

- 2 people like this.

l--------------------94----------------------l-------------95-------------l--------96--------l-----97-----l--98--l-99-l10098+ is GOAT

Well here's my (stupidly accurate for what this is) visual representation. You're welcome.

Man I have no life.

Well here's my (stupidly accurate for what this is) visual representation. You're welcome.

Man I have no life.

- © 2010-2018 VizionEck LLC, All Rights Reserved
- SMF 2.1 Beta 1 © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.120 seconds with 39 queries.