All Uber self-driving cars ordered off roads by California DMV due to multiple errors

Started by Mmm_fish_tacos, Dec 16, 2016, 09:14 PM

previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mmm_fish_tacos

NeoGAF - View Single Post -  All Uber self-driving cars ordered off roads by California DMV due to multiple errors

Quote
/
Quote
Uber blames humans for self-driving car traffic offenses as California orders halt
 Regulators ordered Uber to take self-driving cars off roads in San Francisco and company suspends drivers after vehicles were caught running red lights

 
Quote
California regulators ordered Uber to remove its self-driving vehicles from the road on the same day that the company’s vehicles were caught running red lights – violations the company immediately blamed on “human error”.

 
Quote
A video posted by Charles Rotter, an operations manager at Luxor, a traditional cab company, shows one of Uber’s computer-controlled cars plowing through a pedestrian crosswalk in downtown about four seconds after the light turned red. Elsewhere, a photo from a San Francisco writer showed one of the Uber vehicles entering an intersection against a red light.
 “People could die,” Rotter said in an interview later. “This is obviously not ready for primetime.”
 The traffic violations and threat of legal action are a significant blow to Uber in its home town, where the California department of motor vehicles has said that Uber requires permits to test the technology on its roads.
 Despite that stated mandate from a government agency, Uber declared in a blogpost that it did not believe it needed a “testing permit” to launch self-driving vehicles in San Francisco, arguing that the rules don’t apply since the cars have people in them monitoring movements.

 
Quote
"Just passed a 'self-driving' Uber that lurched into the intersection on Van Ness, on a red, nearly hitting my Lyft."https://twitter.com/AnnieGaus/status/809092604503560192/

 
Quote
“The Uber car sort of jutted out into the intersection,” she told the Guardian by phone, noting that she and her Lyft driver were both taken aback. “It was close enough that we were both kind of like, ‘Woah.’ It’s close enough that you kind of react and are sort of rattled.”

 
Quote
An Uber spokesperson said both cars running red lights were not part of the pilot and were not carrying customers.
 “These incidents were due to human error. This is why we believe so much in making the roads safer by building self-driving Ubers,” the statement said. “The drivers involved have been suspended while we continue to investigate.”
 The company did not immediately respond to questions about the state’s order to remove the cars from the road.

 
Quote
Asked how the San Francisco police department would respond to a self-driving Uber running a red light, officer Giselle Talkoff said: “I don’t even know. I guess we could pull them over.”

 
Quote
A sergeant with the police traffic division said his department was not even aware that Uber had started using autonomous cars in San Francisco.
 Rotter argued that the technology company should be held responsible for sending the vehicles out on the road despite government objections.
 “What this company has done is start operating illegally and push for permission later.”

 
Uber gets litigious in responsehttps://www.theguardian.com/technolo...thical-tactics
Quote
Self-driving cars: Uber's open defiance of California shines light on brazen tactics
 Intense fight with the state, ignited after cars were caught running red lights, exposed illegal and unethical tactics the company has used for years, critics say

 
Quote
Uber has launched an aggressive battle with California over its controversial self-driving cars, with regulators and consumer advocates accusing the corporation of flagrantly violating the law, endangering public safety and mistreating drivers.
 The intense fight with the state – which ignited hours after numerous self-driving cars were caught running red lights in Uber’s home town – has exposed what critics say are the unethical and illegal tactics that the company has repeatedly used to grow its business.

 
Quote
“How many people are they going to kill before they understand they’re not doing the right thing?” said John M Simpson, privacy project director with Consumer Watchdog, a non-profit that has called for Uber to face consequences for side-stepping regulations. “If you’re going to use public highways as your own private laboratory, you’ve got an obligation to follow the rules.”
 Uber’s open defiance of California regulators marks the latest case of a “sharing economy” corporation ignoring government under the guise of “disruption” and “innovation”. Uber has long claimed that it is a technology “platform” and not a transportation company and thus does not have to classify its drivers as employees or follow traditional taxicab regulations.

 
Quote
The San Francisco self-driving car scandal centers on Uber’s Volvo XC90s, which can navigate on their own while licensed drivers sit at the wheel and take control when necessary. The company first piloted semi-autonomous vehicles in Pittsburgh in August.

 
Quote
One San Francisco Uber driver, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation, followed a self-driving car for about 15 minutes on Wednesday and filmed its movements. The footage shows multiple minor violations or potentially dangerous moves, such as failing to fully brake at a stop sign or cutting off a bus.

 
Quote
“It’s a human error, but the vehicle and the technology didn’t compensate,” he said. “The technology itself wasn’t able to avoid running the red light.”

 
Quote
Taborek said publicly admonishing the operators was another example of Uber mistreating drivers. “I would take anything Uber says with massive grains of salt ... I’d be willing to bet good money that the technology is at fault.”

 
Quote
Consumer Watchdog also called for criminal charges against Uber’s CEO Travis Kalanick for violating DMV requirements.
 “This is essentially driving without a license,” Simpson said. “It’s really unconscionable.”

 
If Uber fudge up self-driving cars for us in the pursuit of profit...
 

Mmm_fish_tacos

If anyones actually been following this tech it isnt ready for prime time and wont be for quite awhile.

But im glad to see the smart asses on gaf eat this crow. It wont be the last time either.

kitler53

i hear republicans have reckless abandon for not wanting to regulate anything,.. uber should stick to the heavily red states in the deep south.  they'd get the experience they need to get this ready for prime time and <<something something no so nice>>.

win win!!


Featured Artist: Vanessa Hudgens

Legend

Well that sucks.

Most of those quotes come across as biased or misinformed but the end result is still a step back for self driving cars. Will be interesting to see if it's human error like the company claims. Not fully breaking at a stop sign is not something you'd expect from a computer.

Mmm_fish_tacos

Well that sucks.

Most of those quotes come across as biased or misinformed but the end result is still a step back for self driving cars. Will be interesting to see if it's human error like the company claims. Not fully breaking at a stop sign is not something you'd expect from a computer.
Yes, uber is desperate to be first. They should be more concerned about it being right.

Legend

Yes, uber is desperate to be first. They should be more concerned about it being right.
It's odd that people are "ok" with uber doing self driving cars. You'd think almost all Uber drivers would be protesting.



Getting it "right" with self driving cars is hard to judge. Is it ok if the car is safer than the average driver or does it need to be perfect?

Xevross

It's odd that people are "ok" with uber doing self driving cars. You'd think almost all Uber drivers would be protesting.



Getting it "right" with self driving cars is hard to judge. Is it ok if the car is safer than the average driver or does it need to be perfect?
I would say its okay if its safer than the average driver, although if its not perfect people will complain and it likely won't work. So to be accepted by the public it needs to be pretty much perfect.

Mmm_fish_tacos

It's odd that people are "ok" with uber doing self driving cars. You'd think almost all Uber drivers would be protesting.



Getting it "right" with self driving cars is hard to judge. Is it ok if the car is safer than the average driver or does it need to be perfect?
Perfection is the only way its viable. If uber/any company causes a death it will be a long time before law makers even think about it again.

kitler53

It's odd that people are "ok" with uber doing self driving cars. You'd think almost all Uber drivers would be protesting.



Getting it "right" with self driving cars is hard to judge. Is it ok if the car is safer than the average driver or does it need to be perfect?
th first death because of a driverless car will be huge news in the media and a lot of public outrage.  

the legal implications of who is to blame will alone delay driverless cars as legal prcidence is set. 


Featured Artist: Vanessa Hudgens

the-pi-guy

th first death because of a driverless car will be huge news in the media and a lot of public outrage.  
the legal implications of who is to blame will alone delay driverless cars as legal prcidence is set.
^ Because of this, I think it pretty much has to be perfect.  

It's odd that people are "ok" with uber doing self driving cars. You'd think almost all Uber drivers would be protesting.
I'd guess it's not threatening anyone yet.  
How many cars are there?

Legend

Somewhat goes with this conversation.